Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Cross-Cultural Analysis on Conceptual Metaphors Used in the Written Reports of Disease Outbreak by Mainstream Media

  • Jing Sun
  • , Yohan Hwang
  • , Dong Jin Shin*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Lyuliang University
  • Jeonju University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

This article compares conceptual metaphors related to COVID-19 as manifested in the written reports of mainstream media in China and the United States. According to the three steps of critical metaphor analysis proposed by Charteris-Black (2004), 12 conceptual metaphors in People’s Daily and 13 conceptual metaphors in The New York Times were identified separately by making use of two self-built corpora. The reasons for employing similar and different conceptual metaphors in the coverage of two media have been discussed with the help of the corpus analysis tool. Finally, this study finds that conceptual metaphors concerning COVID-19 have the function of transmitting information about COVID-19, producing a persuasive function, and conveying certain attitudes and ideologies. The findings facilitate cross-cultural communication on COVID-19 and confirm the universality and variations of conceptual metaphors influencing language use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-22
Number of pages22
JournalKorean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
Volume25
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • conceptual metaphor
  • contrastive analysis
  • critical metaphor analysis

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Linguistics
  • Education & Training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Cross-Cultural Analysis on Conceptual Metaphors Used in the Written Reports of Disease Outbreak by Mainstream Media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this