Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A nuclear South Korea?

  • Mun Suk Ahn
  • , Young Chul Cho*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

After North Korea's third nuclear test in February 2013, South Koreans are once again debating whether to go nuclear. Some advocates of South Korean nuclear possession argue that nuclear weapons are necessary for self-defence against the nuclear-armed North. Some support South Korea's nuclearization as leverage vis-à-vis North Korea and China. Some argue that going nuclear will heighten the South's national prestige. However, others counter that South Korea's nuclearization is not desirable and, indeed, barely feasible. First, since North-South conflicts have not diminished since the 1953 truce, the nuclear armament of the two Koreas could result in a nuclear war. Second, the South's nuclearization would only hasten North Korea's ardent pursuit of securing and increasing its stock of nuclear warheads. Third, it would prompt a fierce arms race in Northeast Asia by pressing Japan and Taiwan to go nuclear. Finally, it would undermine Seoul's close ties with Washington. In order to maintain a nuclear-free South Korea, the US needs to reinforce its nuclear umbrella and eradicate the North Korean nuclear threat through active and comprehensive negotiations with Pyongyang.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-34
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal
Volume69
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014.03

Keywords

  • active and comprehensive negotiations
  • arms race
  • leverage
  • national prestige
  • Nuclear armament
  • nuclear threat
  • nuclear umbrella
  • nuclear war

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Politics & International Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A nuclear South Korea?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this