Abstract
After North Korea's third nuclear test in February 2013, South Koreans are once again debating whether to go nuclear. Some advocates of South Korean nuclear possession argue that nuclear weapons are necessary for self-defence against the nuclear-armed North. Some support South Korea's nuclearization as leverage vis-à-vis North Korea and China. Some argue that going nuclear will heighten the South's national prestige. However, others counter that South Korea's nuclearization is not desirable and, indeed, barely feasible. First, since North-South conflicts have not diminished since the 1953 truce, the nuclear armament of the two Koreas could result in a nuclear war. Second, the South's nuclearization would only hasten North Korea's ardent pursuit of securing and increasing its stock of nuclear warheads. Third, it would prompt a fierce arms race in Northeast Asia by pressing Japan and Taiwan to go nuclear. Finally, it would undermine Seoul's close ties with Washington. In order to maintain a nuclear-free South Korea, the US needs to reinforce its nuclear umbrella and eradicate the North Korean nuclear threat through active and comprehensive negotiations with Pyongyang.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 26-34 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | International Journal |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2014.03 |
Keywords
- active and comprehensive negotiations
- arms race
- leverage
- national prestige
- Nuclear armament
- nuclear threat
- nuclear umbrella
- nuclear war
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Politics & International Studies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A nuclear South Korea?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver