Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma

  • Judith G. Villablanca*
  • , Samuel L. Volchenboum
  • , Hwangeui Cho
  • , Min H. Kang
  • , Susan L. Cohn
  • , Clarke P. Anderson
  • , Araz Marachelian
  • , Susan Groshen
  • , Denice Tsao-Wei
  • , Katherine K. Matthay
  • , John M. Maris
  • , Charlotte E. Hasenauer
  • , Scarlett Czarnecki
  • , Hollie Lai
  • , Fariba Goodarzian
  • , Hiro Shimada
  • , Charles Patrick Reynolds
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Southern California
  • The University of Chicago
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Myeloablative therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma commonly includes melphalan. Increased cellular glutathione (GSH) can mediate melphalan resistance. Buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), a GSH synthesis inhibitor, enhances melphalan activity against neuroblastoma cell lines, providing the rationale for a Phase 1 trial of BSO-melphalan. Procedures: Patients with recurrent/resistant high-risk neuroblastoma received BSO (3 gram/m2 bolus, then 24 grams/m2/day infusion days −4 to −2), with escalating doses of intravenous melphalan (20–125 mg/m2) days −3 and −2, and autologous stem cells day 0 using 3 + 3 dose escalation. Results: Among 28 patients evaluable for dose escalation, one dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 20 mg/m2 melphalan (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase) and one at 80 mg/m2 (streptococcal bacteremia, grade 4 hypotension/pulmonary/hypocalcemia) without sequelae. Among 25 patients evaluable for response, there was one partial response (PR) and two mixed responses (MRs) among eight patients with prior melphalan exposure; one PR and three MRs among 16 patients without prior melphalan; one stable disease with unknown melphalan history. Melphalan pharmacokinetics with BSO were similar to reports for melphalan alone. Melphalan Cmax for most patients was below the 10 μM concentration that showed neuroblastoma preclinical activity with BSO. Conclusions: BSO (75 gram/m2) with melphalan (125 mg/m2) is tolerable with stem cell support and active in recurrent/refractory neuroblastoma. Further dose escalation is feasible and may increase responses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1349-1356
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Blood and Cancer
Volume63
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016.08.1

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • buthionine sulfoximine
  • melphalan
  • neuroblastoma
  • Phase 1
  • transplant

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this