Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A prospective, multicenter study on the clinical effectiveness of abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Korea: Pre-vs. post-chemotherapy

  • Seung Hwan Jeong
  • , Sang Eun Yeon
  • , Su Youn Kim
  • , Tae Gyun Kwon
  • , Seong Soo Jeon
  • , Young Deuk Choi
  • , Dongdeuk Kwon
  • , Byung Ha Chung
  • , Sung Hoo Hong
  • , Byung Hoon Kim
  • , Hyo Jin Lee
  • , Sang Joon Shin
  • , Woo Suk Choi
  • , Sung Woo Park
  • , Taek Won Kang
  • , Seok Joong Yun
  • , Jin Seon Cho
  • , See Min Choi
  • , Na Ri Lee
  • , Cheol Kwak*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Seoul National University
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Yonsei University
  • Kyungpook National University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Chonnam National University
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Keimyung University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Konkuk University
  • Pusan National University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Hallym University
  • Gyeongsang National University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The proper treatment sequence for administering abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP) and chemotherapeutic agents has not yet been elucidated for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Hence, this study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of AAP in pre-and post-chemotherapy settings using real-world data. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multicenter, open-label, observational study included 506 patients with mCRPC. Patients were classified according to the timing of chemotherapy into pre-and post-chemotherapy groups. The effectiveness and safety of AAP were compared between the groups; the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, PSA progression-free survival, and radiologic progression-free survival were assessed; and adverse drug reactions were recorded. Results: Among the included patients, 319 and 187 belonged to the pre-and post-chemotherapy groups, respectively. Risk classi-fication was similar between the two groups. The PSA response was 61.8% in the pre-chemotherapy group and 39.0% in the post-chemotherapy group (p<0.001). The median time to PSA progression (5.00 vs. 2.93 mo, p=0.001) and radiologic progression-free survival (11.84 vs. 9.17 mo, p=0.002) were significantly longer in the pre-chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy status was associated with PSA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.77) and radiologic progression (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.18–2.33) during AAP treatment. Adverse drug reactions were reported at similar frequencies in both groups. Conclusions: In this postmarketing surveillance, AAP benefited patients with mCRPC, especially in settings before chemotherapy was ad-ministered, resulting in a high PSA response and longer PSA and radiologic progression-free survival with tolerable adverse drug reactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)466-473
Number of pages8
JournalInvestigative and Clinical Urology
Volume64
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023.09

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Abiraterone
  • Prostate cancer
  • Prostate-specific antigen
  • Real-world data

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective, multicenter study on the clinical effectiveness of abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Korea: Pre-vs. post-chemotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this