Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An elevated value of C-reactive protein is the only predictive factor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

  • Woo Kon Jeong*
  • , Myung Ho Jeong
  • , Kye Hun Kim
  • , Sang Rok Lee
  • , Ok Young Park
  • , Ju Hyup Yum
  • , Joo Han Kim
  • , Won Kim
  • , Jae Young Rhew
  • , Youn Keun Ahn
  • , Jeong Gwan Cho
  • , Byoung Hee Ahn
  • , Soon Pal Suh
  • , Jong Chun Park
  • , Sang Hyung Kim
  • , Jung Chaee Kang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Chonnam National University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current techniques for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) remain limited by restenosis. Recent studies have provided evidence of inflammation playing a role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Whether inflammatory markers are predictors of subsequent restenosis were prospectively tested in 272 consecutive patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Patients having undergone PCI at Chonnam National University Hospital, between Sept. 1999 and Mar. 2001, were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of restenosis on a follow-up coronary angiogram: Group I were patients with restenosis (n = 99, 59.5 +/- 10.8 years, M:F = 77:22) and Group II were those without restenosis (n = 173, 58.8 +/- 10.2 years, M:F = 131:42). The IgG seropositivity, cytomegalovirus (CMV) titers, C. pneumoniae. H. pylori and levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in the seropositivity of the CMV IgG C. pneumoniae IgG and H. pylori IgG between the two groups (Groups I vs. II: 100 vs. 100%, 24.7 vs. 25.7% and 62.2 vs. 63.7%, respectively). Of the angiographic parameters, a low Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow (TIMI 0 or 1) was more common in Group I than Group II (p = 0.038). The patients with an elevated CRP (> 0.5 mg/dL) were more common in Group I than Group II (57.6 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.001), with the CRP values being higher in Group I than Group II (3.3 +/- 5.8 vs. 1.3 +/- 2.6 mg/dL, p = 0.001). According to a multiple logistic regression analysis, the CRP was the only predictor of restenosis, with an odds ratio of 2.1169 (95% C.I. 1.2062-3.7154, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The CRP value is the most important predictor of restenosis after PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)154-160
Number of pages7
JournalKorean Journal of Internal Medicine
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An elevated value of C-reactive protein is the only predictive factor of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this