Abstract
This study conducted quantitative comparisons of various public R&D support options using a CGE model. The analysis considered four different options by varying the types of fiscal incentives and the scope of beneficiaries concerning the firm size. The findings indicate that direct subsidy is more effective in spurring private R&D investments than indirect tax incentives. In addition, selective R&D support toward small and medium enterprises is found to induce balanced growth among industries. In summary, the simulation results suggest that R&D support under the direct subsidy scheme aimed at SMEs has the potential to achieve a higher equilibrium state within the Korean economy. This study confirms that the government should carefully design the R&D promotion policy by ensuring that direct R&D inducement effects are transmitted to industrial output growth with a diversified industrial structure and higher knowledge spillover effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 4664-4680 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Applied Economics |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 40 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- C68
- Computable general equilibrium
- Innovation
- O30
- O32
- O38
- O40
- O50
- Public subsidy
- R&D
- SME
- Tax incentive
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Economics & Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the economy-wide impacts of public R&D support options based on a computable general equilibrium model: focusing on types of fiscal incentives and beneficiaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver