Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Atomistic Insights into the Electrochemical Oxygen Evolution Activity of Hollandite IrO2 Surfaces

  • Sangseob Lee
  • , Kisung Kang
  • , Taehun Lee*
  • , Aloysius Soon*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Lowering the overpotential for the oxygen-evolution reaction (OER) is central to designing efficient water-splitting catalysts. However, the atomistic origin behind the enhanced OER activity of hollandite IrO2 compared to rutile has remained unclear. Here, using grand-canonical DFT with an implicit solvation model, the electrochemical stability and reactivity of the most stable hollandite facets, (100) and (112) are elucidated. The thermodynamic analysis identifies that hollandite is more readily oxidized than rutile under the working potential of 1.6 V and predicts potential-driven deintercalation of K+ from Hol(112) surface. Fully K-deintercalated hollandite surfaces exhibit lower overpotentials than rutile (110) due to local lattice distortions that enhance π-bonding with *O species. Additionally, the hollandite (112) surface possesses an exceptionally low O2 desorption energy of 0.45 eV (less than half that of rutile), pointing to a highly efficient O2-release process. The theoretical predictions clarify the atomistic origin of the experimentally observed OER reactivity of the hollandite phase and provide deeper insight into structure–activity relationships in hollandite IrO2, providing rational design strategies for next-generation OER catalysts.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14939
JournalAdvanced Science
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026.01.30

Keywords

  • grand-canonical density functional theory
  • hollandite phase
  • iridium oxide
  • oxygen evolution reaction (OER)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atomistic Insights into the Electrochemical Oxygen Evolution Activity of Hollandite IrO2 Surfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this