Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy versus warfarin as a secondary prevention strategy for AntiPhospholipid Syndrome-related STROKE (APS-STROKE): Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial

  • University of Ulsan
  • Inha University
  • Hanyang University
  • Kangwon National University
  • Hallym University
  • Seoul National University
  • Jeju National University
  • Konkuk University
  • Yonsei University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Chonnam National University
  • Korea University
  • Ewha Womans University
  • Kyung Hee University
  • Pusan National University
  • Keimyung University
  • Eulji University
  • Inje University
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Yeungnam University
  • Chosun University
  • Gachon University
  • Chung-Ang University
  • SMG-SNU Seoul Boramae Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is closely associated with ischemic stroke. However, optimal treatment for APS-related stroke remains unestablished, as current guidelines are based on outdated studies and expert opinion rather than high-quality clinical trials. Evidence on antiplatelet agents other than aspirin, such as clopidogrel, in APS-related stroke is particularly limited. Given the relatively young age of patients with APS and the burden of warfarin use, verifying its necessity is crucial. This study compares clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy and warfarin for secondary prevention in APS-related stroke. Methods: APS-STROKE is an exploratory, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint clinical trial. Adult patients with definite APS and a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) will be included. Patients with high-risk APS (triple positivity or persistently high titers of anti-cardiolipin or anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies), systemic lupus erythematosus, or other major indications for continued antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy will be excluded. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy or warfarin. More than 200 patients are planned for inclusion across 32 stroke centers. The primary endpoint is a composite of any death, major adverse cardiovascular events, systemic thromboembolic events, and major bleeding during at least 4 years of follow-up. Secondary endpoints include major adverse cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, any bleeding, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, any death, and thrombosis-related death. Conclusion: This study will provide valuable information on the optimal secondary prevention strategy for APS-related stroke. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05995600; CRIS: KCT0008900.

Original languageKorean
Article number108164
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume160
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026.01.1

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antiphospholipid syndrome
  • Antiplatelet
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Secondary prevention
  • Warfarin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of clopidogrel-based antiplatelet therapy versus warfarin as a secondary prevention strategy for AntiPhospholipid Syndrome-related STROKE (APS-STROKE): Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this