Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation (from the DECLARE-DIABETES and -LONG Trials)

  • Seung Whan Lee
  • , Kook Jin Chun
  • , Seong Wook Park*
  • , Hyun Sook Kim
  • , Young Hak Kim
  • , Sung Cheol Yun
  • , Won Jang Kim
  • , Jong Young Lee
  • , Duk Woo Park
  • , Cheol Whan Lee
  • , Myeong Ki Hong
  • , Kyoung Suk Rhee
  • , Jei Keon Chae
  • , Jae Ki Ko
  • , Jae Hyeong Park
  • , Jae Hwan Lee
  • , Si Wan Choi
  • , Jin Ok Jeong
  • , In Whan Seong
  • , Suh Jon
  • Yoon Haeng Cho, Nae Hee Lee, June Hong Kim, Seung Jung Park
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Although cilostazol has decreased restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after drug-eluting stent implantation, it is not known if this effect is durable at 2 years. We analyzed 2 randomized studies (Drug-Eluting stenting followed by Cilostazol treatment reduces LAte REstenosis in patients with DIABETES mellitus and Drug-Eluting Stenting Followed by Cilostazol treatment reduces LAte REstenosis in patients with LONG native coronary lesions trials) in which 900 patients were randomly assigned to triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, and cilostazol; triple group, n = 450) and dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel; standard group, n = 450) for 6 months in patients with diabetes or long lesions receiving drug-eluting stents. We evaluated 2-year major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including death, myocardial infarction (MI), and TLR. Nine-month TLRs and MACEs were significantly decreased in the triple versus standard group. At 2 years, the triple group sowed significantly decreased TLRs (4.2% vs 9.1%, hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.78, p = 0.004) and MACEs (5.6% vs 10.4%, hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.84, p = 0.008) compared to the standard group with no differences in death and MI. In subgroup analysis, triple antiplatelet therapy decrease of 2-year TLR was favorable in all subgroups, especially in patients with paclitaxel-eluting stents, diabetes mellitus, small vessels, long lesions, and left anterior descending coronary artery lesions. In conclusion, compared to the standard group, initial benefit in decreases of 9-month TLRs and MACEs in the triple group was sustained at 2 years with no differences in death or MI. Triple antiplatelet therapy decrease of 2-year TLR was favorable in all subgroups, especially in patients with high-risk profiles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-173
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume105
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010.01.15

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Triple Antiplatelet Therapy and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients at High Risk of Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation (from the DECLARE-DIABETES and -LONG Trials)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this