Context effects on reproduced magnitudes from short-term and long-term memory

Extant research has demonstrated strong contextual dependencies in reproducing magnitudes of perceptual stimuli from short-term memory. Two experiments examined how context as defined by (a) the mean of the distribution, (b) stimulus ranks, (c) values of anchor stimuli used in the reproduction task, and (d) values from the most recent trial operate on estimates of square size. Experiment 1 demonstrated distributional contrast effects on ratings of squares and distributional assimilation effects on reproduction of squares from short-term memory for the same participants. The fit of a modified version of the category adjustment model demonstrated reliable effects of the running mean, start anchors, and previous stimulus on reproduction bias. In Experiment 2, participants first learned to associate labels with squares, then reproduced square sizes based on the label cues, a long-term memory task, followed by a reproduction from short-term memory task as in Experiment 1. Results for the short-term memory task were largely consistent with Experiment 1. Results for the long-term memory task showed a very different pattern of effects, with larger reproduced sizes when squares were drawn from positively skewed rather than negatively skewed distributions. This contrast effect was explained by a modified range-frequency model as the result of rank encoding of square values along with displacement away from the running mean and shifts towards the prior response and start anchors. The combined results identify multiple sources of context effects in estimation that depend critically on memory retrieval factors and show how they can be incorporated into existing models.