Abstract
The authors regret that the following inadvertent errors occurred, and some mandatory corrections were done as reflected below: 1. Revision in Fig. 13 (page 10) in Theoretical Li amount (g), Recovered Li amount (g), and Efficiency (%) of Chemical reactions in Fig. 13 should be corrected to the values in terms of Li amount as follow: [Table presented] The error is misrepresented values in Chemical reactions and does not affect other equations and total recovery efficiency (%). Fig. 13 was also modified to reflect the above information as follows: The authors would like to apologise for the inconvenience this error may have caused to the reader of the journal.[Formula presented] Fig. 13 Flowsheet of overall recovery process for Li2CO3 from WBS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106130 |
| Journal | Hydrometallurgy |
| Volume | 221 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 2023.08 |
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Engineering - Mechanical
- Materials Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Recovery of lithium from LiAlO2 in waste box sagger through sulfation to produce Li2SO4 and sequential wet conversion to Li3PO4, LiCl and Li2CO3” [Hydrometallurgy 215 (2023) 105988] (Hydrometallurgy (2023) 215, (S0304386X22001736), (10.1016/j.hydromet.2022.105988))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver