Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Deep Learning Classification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Predicts Outcomes

  • Stephen M. Humphries
  • , Devlin Thieke
  • , David Baraghoshi
  • , Matthew J. Strand
  • , Jeffrey J. Swigris
  • , Kum Ju Chae
  • , Hye Jeon Hwang
  • , Andrea S. Oh
  • , Kevin R. Flaherty
  • , Ayodeji Adegunsoye
  • , Renea Jablonski
  • , Cathryn T. Lee
  • , Aliya N. Husain
  • , Jonathan H. Chung
  • , Mary E. Strek
  • , David A. Lynch
  • National Jewish Health
  • University of Ulsan
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • The University of Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale: Computed tomography (CT) enables noninvasive diagnosis of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), but enhanced image analyses are needed to overcome the limitations of visual assessment. Objectives: Apply multiple instance learning (MIL) to develop an explainable deep learning algorithm for prediction of UIP from CT and validate its performance in independent cohorts. Methods: We trained an MIL algorithm using a pooled dataset (n = 2,143) and tested it in three independent populations: data from a prior publication (n = 127), a single-institution clinical cohort (n = 239), and a national registry of patients with pulmonary fibrosis (n = 979). We tested UIP classification performance using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with histologic UIP as ground truth. Cox proportional hazards and linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between MIL predictions and survival or longitudinal FVC. Measurements and Main Results: In two cohorts with biopsy data, MIL improved accuracy for histologic UIP (area under the curve, 0.77 [n = 127] and 0.79 [n = 239]) compared with visual assessment (area under the curve, 0.65 and 0.71). In cohorts with survival data, MIL-UIP classifications were significant for mortality (n = 239, mortality to April 2021: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96–4.91; P, 0.001; and n = 979, mortality to July 2022: unadjusted hazard ratio, 3.64; 95% CI, 2.66–4.97; P, 0.001). Individuals classified as UIP positive by the algorithm had a significantly greater annual decline in FVC than those classified as UIP negative (288 ml/yr vs. 245 ml/yr; n = 979; P, 0.01), adjusting for extent of lung fibrosis. Conclusions: Computerized assessment using MIL identifies clinically significant features of UIP on CT. Such a method could improve confidence in radiologic assessment of patients with interstitial lung disease, potentially enabling earlier and more precise diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1121-1131
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume209
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024.05.1

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • computed tomography
  • deep learning
  • pulmonary fibrosis
  • usual interstitial pneumonia

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deep Learning Classification of Usual Interstitial Pneumonia Predicts Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this