Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS:: Sixty-two patients (81 HCCs) who underwent MDCT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using a 3-dimensional volumetric interpolated technique with a mean interval of 7 days (range, 3-11 days) were included in this study. Two observers reached a consensus on 2 sets of images: the gadoxetic acid set (unenhanced, early dynamic, 10-minute, and 20-minute hepatocyte phase images) and the 3-phase MDCT. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were evaluated using the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic method. Results: There was a trend toward increased area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az value) for the gadoxetic acid set (0.963) as compared with the MDCT (0.930), but no significant difference was found (P = 0.41). Sensitivity of the gadoxetic acid set (91.4%) was better than that of the MDCT (71.6%; P = 0.0001). There were 12 lesions that showed only arterial hypervascularization on MDCT but showed arterial hypervascularization and delayed hypointensity on the gadoxetic acid set. Conclusions: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, including hepatocyte phase imaging, is more sensitive than MDCT for the detection of HCCs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 844-850 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Computed tomography (CT)
- Contrast media
- Liver neoplasms
- Magnetic resonance (MR)
- Technology
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging versus multi-detector row computed tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver