Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Economic assessment of alternative Pyro-SFR nuclear fuel cycle in Korea

  • S. K. Kim*
  • , W. I. Ko
  • , Yoon Hee Lee
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt was made to present the cost required to dry-process spent fuel for a light-water reactor (PWR) and to evaluate the economy of Pyro-processing. As the Pyro-processing cost of dry-processing is calculated to be 781 $/kgHM and the break-even point of the Pyro-processing cost for direct disposal is calculated to be approximately $800/kgHM, it was determined that the Pyro-SFR connected nuclear fuel cycle is somewhat more economical than direct disposal. However, since there is no commercial Pyro facility available as of yet, uncertainty regarding the Pyro facility cost is very large. And as a result of a cost uncertainty analysis, the cost differential between direct disposal and Pyro-SFR nuclear fuel cycle has turned out to be within the statistical range of error. Hence, a judgment as to the relative economic benefit between direct disposal and Pyro-processing is hard to make for the time being. However, if a more efficient continuous process technology is developed for Pyro-processing in the future, the economical viability of the process is expected to be improved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)124-132
Number of pages9
JournalProgress in Nuclear Energy
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Economic analysis
  • Nonproliferation resistance
  • Nuclear fuel cycle
  • Pyro-SFR
  • Pyroprocessing
  • Radioactive waste

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic assessment of alternative Pyro-SFR nuclear fuel cycle in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this