Abstract
In order to evaluate the corrosion resistance of a cathode-side separator for a molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC), SUS316 and SACC-SUS316 (chromium and aluminum were simultaneously deposited by diffusion into SUS316 austenitic stainless steel substrate using the pack-cementation process) were used as the separator materials. In the case of SUS316, corrosion proceeded via three steps: the formation of a corrosion product until the corrosion product becomes stable; the protection against corrosion until breakaway occurs; and the advancement of corrosion after breakaway. Since SUS316 showed a high corrosion rate in the cathode environment, it would be impossible to use it as a separator without suitable surface modification because of the occurrence of severe stability problems of the cell during long-term operation. In contrast, SACC-SUS316 showed higher corrosion resistance than the present separator material, SUS316. No corrosion was observed on SACC-SUS316 after 480 h at 923 K. Therefore, this material is thought to be very useful as an alternative separator at the cathode side for MCFC in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 593-600 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Materials Transactions |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002.03 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Keywords
- Coating
- Corrosion rate
- Molten carbonate fuel cell
- Separator
- SUS316 austenitic stainless steel
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of corrosion resistance of coated and uncoated stainless-steel separators at cathode side for molten carbonate fuel cell'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver