Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea

  • Yun Young Kim
  • , Hyung Joo Park*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Jeonbuk National University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined how deprivation differed by region and the effect those differences had on suicidal ideation among the local population. Methods: Data collected over 10 years (2012-2021) in the Korea Welfare Panel Study were organized into 3 categories: metropolitan, city, and rural. A panel analysis was conducted on the impact of deprivation indices, socio-demographic characteristics, and life satisfaction on suicidal ideation in each category. Results: Income, divorce status, family relationship satisfaction, and medical deprivation had a significant impact on suicidal ideation in metropolitan areas, whereas these variables did not have significant effects in rural areas. In other words, income, family, and medical support were more impactful in city areas. Conclusions: Although the deprivation index was higher in rural areas than in city areas due to an aging population and reduced income levels, the mental health of rural residents was found to be generally better than that of city residents. The possibility that this is related to the strength of relationships within the respective communities should be considered in light of recent discussions on relational welfare.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-94
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023.01.1

Keywords

  • Deprivation index
  • Regional differences
  • Relational welfare
  • Suicidal ideation

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors Influencing Suicidal Ideation According to the Deprivation Indices of Different Regions in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this