Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Five million years of Antarctic Circumpolar Current strength variability

  • Frank Lamy*
  • , Gisela Winckler
  • , Helge W. Arz
  • , Jesse R. Farmer
  • , Julia Gottschalk
  • , Lester Lembke-Jene
  • , Jennifer L. Middleton
  • , Michèlle van der Does
  • , Ralf Tiedemann
  • , Carlos Alvarez Zarikian
  • , Chandranath Basak
  • , Anieke Brombacher
  • , Levin Dumm
  • , Oliver M. Esper
  • , Lisa C. Herbert
  • , Shinya Iwasaki
  • , Gaston Kreps
  • , Vera J. Lawson
  • , Li Lo
  • , Elisa Malinverno
  • Alfredo Martinez-Garcia, Elisabeth Michel, Simone Moretti, Christopher M. Moy, Ana Christina Ravelo, Christina R. Riesselman, Mariem Saavedra-Pellitero, Henrik Sadatzki, Inah Seo, Raj K. Singh, Rebecca A. Smith, Alexandre L. Souza, Joseph S. Stoner, Maria Toyos, Igor M.Venancio P. de Oliveira, Sui Wan, Shuzhuang Wu, Xiangyu Zhao
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • University of Bremen
  • Columbia University
  • Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research
  • University of Massachusetts Boston
  • Kiel University
  • Texas A&M University
  • University of Delaware
  • Yale University
  • Stony Brook University
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
  • Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
  • National Taiwan University
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
  • CNRS
  • University of Otago
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • University of Portsmouth
  • Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bhubaneswar
  • University of Massachusetts
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Oregon State University
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • CAS - South China Sea Institute of Oceanology
  • University of Lausanne
  • National Institute of Polar Research

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

The Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) represents the world’s largest ocean-current system and affects global ocean circulation, climate and Antarctic ice-sheet stability1–3. Today, ACC dynamics are controlled by atmospheric forcing, oceanic density gradients and eddy activity4. Whereas palaeoceanographic reconstructions exhibit regional heterogeneity in ACC position and strength over Pleistocene glacial–interglacial cycles5–8, the long-term evolution of the ACC is poorly known. Here we document changes in ACC strength from sediment cores in the Pacific Southern Ocean. We find no linear long-term trend in ACC flow since 5.3 million years ago (Ma), in contrast to global cooling9 and increasing global ice volume10. Instead, we observe a reversal on a million-year timescale, from increasing ACC strength during Pliocene global cooling to a subsequent decrease with further Early Pleistocene cooling. This shift in the ACC regime coincided with a Southern Ocean reconfiguration that altered the sensitivity of the ACC to atmospheric and oceanic forcings11–13. We find ACC strength changes to be closely linked to 400,000-year eccentricity cycles, probably originating from modulation of precessional changes in the South Pacific jet stream linked to tropical Pacific temperature variability14. A persistent link between weaker ACC flow, equatorward-shifted opal deposition and reduced atmospheric CO2 during glacial periods first emerged during the Mid-Pleistocene Transition (MPT). The strongest ACC flow occurred during warmer-than-present intervals of the Plio-Pleistocene, providing evidence of potentially increasing ACC flow with future climate warming.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-796
Number of pages8
JournalNature
Volume627
Issue number8005
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024.03.28

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five million years of Antarctic Circumpolar Current strength variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this