Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study

  • Jihye Kim
  • , Moon Haeng Hur
  • , Seung Up Kim
  • , Jin Wook Kim
  • , Dong Hyun Sinn
  • , Hyun Woong Lee
  • , Moon Young Kim
  • , Jae Youn Cheong
  • , Yong Jin Jung
  • , Han Ah Lee
  • , Young Joo Jin
  • , Jun Sik Yoon
  • , Sung Jae Park
  • , Chang Hun Lee
  • , In Hee Kim
  • , June Sung Lee
  • , Young Youn Cho
  • , Hyung Joon Kim
  • , Soo Young Park
  • , Yeon Seok Seo
  • Hyunwoo Oh, Dae Won Jun, Mi Na Kim, Young Chang, Jae Young Jang, Sang Youn Hwang, Yoon Jun Kim*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Seoul National University
  • Yonsei University
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
  • Ajou University
  • SMG-SNU Seoul Boramae Medical Center
  • Ewha Womans University
  • Inha University
  • Inje University
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Kyungpook National University
  • Korea University
  • Eulji University
  • Hanyang University
  • CHA University
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is reportedly superior or at least comparable to entecavir (ETV) in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients; however, it remains controversial. This study aimed to conduct comprehensive comparisons between the two antivirals. CHB patients initially treated with ETV or TDF between 2012 and 2015 at 20 referral centers in Korea were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of HCC. The secondary outcomes included death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, extrahepatic malignancy, development of cirrhosis, decompensation events, complete virologic response (CVR), seroconversion rate, and safety. Baseline characteristics were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Overall, 4210 patients were enrolled: 1019 received ETV and 3191 received TDF. During the median follow-ups of 5.6 and 5.5 years, 86 and 232 cases of HCC were confirmed in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively. There was no difference in HCC incidence between the groups both before (p = 0.36) and after IPTW was applied (p = 0.81). Although the incidence of extrahepatic malignancy was significantly higher in the ETV group than in the TDF group before weighting (p = 0.02), no difference was confirmed after IPTW (p = 0.29). The cumulative incidence rates of death or liver transplantation, liver-related outcome, new cirrhosis development, and decompensation events were also comparable in the crude population (p = 0.24–0.91) and in the IPTW-adjusted population (p = 0.39–0.80). Both groups exhibited similar rates of CVR (ETV vs. TDF: 95.1% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.38), and negative conversion of hepatitis B e antigen (41.6% vs. 37.2%, p = 0.09) or surface antigen (2.8% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.10). Compared to the ETV group, more patients in the TDF group changed initial antivirals due to side effects, including decreased kidney function (n = 17), hypophosphatemia (n = 20), and osteoporosis (n = 18). In this large-scale multicenter study, ETV and TDF demonstrated comparable effectiveness across a broad range of outcomes in patients with treatment-naïve CHB during similar follow-up periods.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2936
JournalCancers
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023.06

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • entecavir
  • extrahepatic malignancy
  • liver cancer
  • tenofovir
  • virologic response

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine
  • Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis of Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Large-Scale Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this