Abstract
This study aimed to validate career decision ambiguity tolerance scale-Korean form applicable to a Korean sample. In study 1, 17-items from the original 18-item career decision ambiguity tolerance scale were valid based on IRT. In study 2, using the confirmatory factor analysis, we showed that excluding item 4 from the original scale is better than including it in the three factors model. Given the results of study 1 and 2, the constructs in the 17-item career decision ambiguity tolerance scale-Korean form were valid. In study 3, career decision ambiguity tolerance positively predicted career decision-making self-efficacy, career indecision, and career adaptability, respectively, after controlling for calling and career search self-efficacy. Thus, the incremental validity of the career decision ambiguity tolerance scale-Korean form was ensured. In study 4, the reliability of the scale was retained as the test-retest (conducted over a 4-week period) demonstrated adequate results.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2067 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Volume | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019.09.10 |
Keywords
- career decision
- career decision ambiguity tolerance
- career decision self-efficacy
- career indecision
- tolerance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating Psychometrics of Career Decision Ambiguity Tolerance Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver