Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Key-Recovery Attack on 5-Round AES with Multiple-of-8 Property

  • Hanbeom Shin
  • , Sunyeop Kim
  • , Byoungjin Seok
  • , Dongjae Lee*
  • , Deukjo Hong
  • , Jaechul Sung
  • , Seokhie Hong
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Korea University
  • Hansung University
  • Kangwon National University
  • University of Seoul

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

SUMMARY At EUROCRYPT 2017, Grassi et al. proposed the multiple-of-8 property for 5-round AES, which states that the number of pairs in a certain input-output subspace, referred to as right pairs, is always a multiple of 8. However, no key-recovery attack has been proposed that utilizes this property until now. In this paper, we identify a new aspect of the multiple-of-8 property: when the number of right pairs is exactly eight, these eight pairs all have the same difference from after the 1st round SubBytes to before the 4th round SubBytes. Based on this observation, we propose a new key-recovery attack on 5-round AES. Our attack requires data and time complexities of 232.6 chosen plaintexts and 5-round AES encryptions, and a memory complexity of 231 128-bit blocks to recover a 32-bit subkey with a success probability of 50.5%. Although it is not the best attack on 5-round AES, it is notable as the first key-recovery attack that utilizes the multiple-of-8 property. We validate our observation through experiments and demonstrate its applicability to other ciphers with SPN structures, beyond AES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)712-724
Number of pages13
JournalIEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
VolumeE109.A
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026.03

Keywords

  • AES
  • key-recovery attack
  • mixture-differential cryptanalysis
  • multiple-of-8 property

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Key-Recovery Attack on 5-Round AES with Multiple-of-8 Property'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this