Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measurements of major VOCs released into the closed cabin environment of different automobiles under various engine and ventilation scenarios

  • Ki Hyun Kim*
  • , Jan E. Szulejko
  • , Hyo Jae Jo
  • , Min Hee Lee
  • , Yong Hyun Kim
  • , Eilhann Kwon
  • , Chang Jin Ma
  • , Pawan Kumar
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Hanyang University
  • Sejong University
  • Fukuoka Women's University
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in automobile cabins were measured quantitatively to describe their emission characteristics in relation to various idling scenarios using three used automobiles (compact, intermediate sedan, and large sedan) under three different idling conditions ([1] cold engine off and ventilation off, [2] exterior air ventilation with idling warm engine, and [3] internal air recirculation with idling warm engine). The ambient air outside the vehicle was also analyzed as a reference. A total of 24 VOCs (with six functional groups) were selected as target compounds. Accordingly, the concentration of 24 VOC quantified as key target compounds averaged 4.58 ± 3.62 ppb (range: 0.05 (isobutyl alcohol) ∼ 38.2 ppb (formaldehyde)). Moreover, if their concentrations are compared between different automobile operational modes: the 'idling engine' levels (5.24 ± 4.07) was 1.3-5 times higher than the 'engine off' levels (4.09 ± 3.23) across all 3 automobile classes. In summary, automobile in-cabin VOC emissions are highly contingent on changes in engine and ventilation modes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-346
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume215
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016.08.1

Keywords

  • Cabin air
  • Engine running mode
  • Internal air circulation
  • Static vehicle
  • VOC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measurements of major VOCs released into the closed cabin environment of different automobiles under various engine and ventilation scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this