Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate and nitrate: Binding competition between chromate and nitrate

  • Kitae Baek
  • , Ji Won Yang*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Simultaneous removal of chromate and nitrate, major anionic pollutants in subsurface water system, was investigated using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with cetylpyridinium chloride as a cationic surfactant. Rejection of nitrate and chromate was expressed as a function of molar ratio of surfactant to pollutants. With the molar ratio of 1:1:10 (chromate: nitrate: surfactant), rejection of nitrate and chromate reached 80% and 98%, respectively. Rejection of surfactant was observed to be >95% under the same conditions. The rejection of nitrate was inhibited by co-existence of chromate. It was due to the differences in binding power between ionic micelles and counter ions, which is proportional to the valence of counter ions; the valence of chromate was higher than that of nitrate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-118
Number of pages8
JournalDesalination
Volume167
Issue number1-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004.08.15

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation

Keywords

  • Chromate
  • Competitive binding
  • Groundwater
  • Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
  • Nitrate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate and nitrate: Binding competition between chromate and nitrate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this