Abstract
Simultaneous removal of chromate and nitrate, major anionic pollutants in subsurface water system, was investigated using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with cetylpyridinium chloride as a cationic surfactant. Rejection of nitrate and chromate was expressed as a function of molar ratio of surfactant to pollutants. With the molar ratio of 1:1:10 (chromate: nitrate: surfactant), rejection of nitrate and chromate reached 80% and 98%, respectively. Rejection of surfactant was observed to be >95% under the same conditions. The rejection of nitrate was inhibited by co-existence of chromate. It was due to the differences in binding power between ionic micelles and counter ions, which is proportional to the valence of counter ions; the valence of chromate was higher than that of nitrate.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 111-118 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Desalination |
| Volume | 167 |
| Issue number | 1-3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2004.08.15 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
Keywords
- Chromate
- Competitive binding
- Groundwater
- Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
- Nitrate
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate and nitrate: Binding competition between chromate and nitrate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver