Abstract
Objective The aim of the study was to compare the mortality rates of patients with early-identi-fied (EI) sepsis and late-identified (LI) sepsis. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with sepsis. EI sepsis was defined as patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 2, based on 3 parameters of the SOFA score (Glasgow coma scale, mean arterial pressure, and partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio), measured within an hour of emergency department admission. The remaining patients were defined as LI sepsis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results Of the total 204 patients with sepsis, 113 (55.4%) had EI sepsis. Overall mortality rate was 15.7%, and EI sepsis group had significantly higher mortality than LI sepsis (23.0% vs. 6.6%, P=0.003). The patients with EI sepsis, compared to those with LI sepsis, had higher SOFA score (median: 4 vs. 2, P<0.001); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (median: 14 vs. 10, P<0.001); were more likely to progress to septic shock within 6 hours after admission (17.7% vs. 1.1%, P<0.001); were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (2.2% vs. 1.1%, P=0.001). Conclusion Mortality was significantly higher in the EI sepsis group than in the LI sepsis group.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 150-160 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2020.09 |
Keywords
- Mortality
- Sepsis
- Shock, septic
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Nursing
- Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mortality difference between early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver