Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nationwide study of humidifier disinfectant lung injury in South Korea, 1994-2011 incidence and dose-response relationships

  • Domyung Paek*
  • , Younsuck Koh
  • , Dong Uk Park
  • , Hae Kwan Cheong
  • , Kyung Hyun Do
  • , Chae Man Lim
  • , Soo Jong Hong
  • , Yong Hwa Kim
  • , Jong Han Leem
  • , Kyu Hyuck Chung
  • , Ye Yong Choi
  • , Jong Hyeon Lee
  • , Sin Ye Lim
  • , Eun Hee Chung
  • , Young Ah Cho
  • , Eun Jin Chae
  • , Joon Sung Joh
  • , Yup Yoon
  • , Kyu Hong Lee
  • , Bo Youl Choi
  • Jin Gwack
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Seoul National University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Korea National Open University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Korea Institute of Toxicology
  • Inha University
  • Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health
  • NeoEnBiz Company
  • Kyung Hee University
  • National Medical Center
  • Hanyang University
  • Korea National Institute of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Rationale: Humidifier disinfectant lung injury is an acute lung disease attributed to recurrent inhalation of certain disinfectant aerosols emitted from room humidifiers. An outbreak of this toxic lung injury occurred in South Korea from 1995 until all humidifier disinfectant products were recalled from the consumer market by the government in 2011. Objectives: A nationwide study was conducted to ascertain and classify all potential cases of humidifier disinfectant lung injury in Korea and to assess dose-response relationships. Methods: By several mechanisms, clinicians and the general public were invited to report all suspected cases of humidifier disinfectant lung injury to public health officials in South Korea. A committee was convened to define diagnostic criteria based on pathologic, radiologic, and clinical findings for index cases, combined with assessment of environmental exposure to humidifier disinfectants. Clinical review and environmental assessments were performed and later combined to determine overall likelihood of disease for each study participant, classified as definite, probable, possible, or unlikely. Survival time from exposure to onset of symptoms was analyzed to assess dose-response relationships. Three broad categories of risk factors were examined: (1) biological susceptibility, (2) temporal cycle of exposure and recovery, and (3) spatial conditions and density of disinfectant. Measurements and Main Results: Of 374 possible cases identified and reviewed, 329 were unanimously classified by the diagnostic committee, as follows: 117 definite, 34 probable, 38 possible and 140 unlikely cases. A total of 62 individuals with definite or probable disease died. Risk factors examined for polyhexamethyleneguanidine phosphate exposure that were found to be significant in shortening survival included age 4 years or younger at onset, use of disinfectant for 7 days per week, airborne density of 800 mg/m3 or more of disinfectant, and daily exposure 11 or more hours in duration. Conclusions: Dose-response analysis indicated that development of humidifier disinfectant lung injury and death were associated strongly with recurrent, intense, acute exposure without sufficient recovery time between exposures, more so than longterm cumulative exposure. These findings may explain some reversible or clinically unapparent cases among coexposed family members.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1813-1821
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015.12

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humidifier biocide
  • Methylisothiazolinone
  • Minimum acute exposure
  • Oligo(2-(2-ethoxy)ethoxyethylguanidinium chloride
  • Polyhexamethyleneguanidine phosphate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nationwide study of humidifier disinfectant lung injury in South Korea, 1994-2011 incidence and dose-response relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this