Odontogenic effect of a fast-setting pozzolan-based pulp capping material

Introduction Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is widely used as a pulp capping material. Recently, a MTA-derived fast-setting pozzolan cement (Endocem; Maruchi, Wonju, Korea) was introduced in the endodontic field. Our aim in this study was to investigate the odontogenic effects of this cement in vitro and in vivo. Methods Human dental pulp cells (hDPCs) were cultured, and the effects of Endocem and a previously marketed MTA (ProRoot; Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) on biocompatibility were evaluated by assessing cell morphology and performing a cell viability test. Chemical composition of each material was analyzed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis. Odontoblastic differentiation was analyzed by alkaline phosphatase activity and alizarin red S staining. The expression of odontogenic-related markers, namely dentin sialophosphoprotein, dentin matrix protein 1, and osteonectin, was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence analysis. Pinpoint pulp exposures were made on rat teeth and then capped with ProRoot or Endocem. After 4 weeks, reparative tertiary dentin formation and inflammatory responses were investigated histologically. Results The biocompatibility of Endocem was similar to that of ProRoot. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic analysis showed that ProRoot and Endocem contained similar elemental constituents such as calcium, oxygen, and silicon. Alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralized nodule formation increased in ProRoot- and Endocem-treated cells compared with medium only-treated cells in the control group (P <.05). The expression of odontogenic-related markers was significantly higher in the ProRoot- and Endocem-treated groups than the control group (P <.05), but there was no significant difference in the expression of these markers between the 2 experimental groups (P >.05). Four weeks after the pulp capping procedure, continuous tertiary dentin had formed directly underneath the capping materials and the pulp exposure area in all samples in the 2 treated groups. Furthermore, most specimens either had no inflammation or minor pulpal inflammation. Conclusions Our results indicate that ProRoot and Endocem have similar biocompatibility and odontogenic effects. Therefore, Endocem is as effective a pulp capping material as ProRoot.