Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Omission of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ypN+ breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective multicenter study (KROG 21-06)

  • Younghee Park
  • , Young Seob Shin
  • , Kyubo Kim*
  • , Kyung Hwan Shin*
  • , Ji Hyun Chang
  • , Su Ssan Kim
  • , Jin Hong Jung
  • , Won Park
  • , Haeyoung Kim
  • , Yong Bae Kim
  • , Sung Ja Ahn
  • , Myungsoo Kim
  • , Jin Hee Kim
  • , Hye Jung Cha
  • , Tae Gyu Kim
  • , Hae Jin Park
  • , Sun Young Lee
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Ewha Womans University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Seoul National University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Yonsei University
  • Chonnam National University
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Keimyung University
  • Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine
  • Hanyang University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the impact of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) on oncological outcomes in breast cancer patients with residual nodal disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent NAC followed by surgical resection and had residual nodal disease were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 1273 patients from 12 institutions were included; all underwent postoperative radiotherapy. Axillary surgery consisted of ALND in 1103 patients (86.6%) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) alone in 170 (13.4%). Univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: The median follow-up was 75.3 months (range, 2.5–182.7). Axillary recurrence rates were 4.8% in the ALND group (n = 53) and 4.7% in the SLNBx group (n = 8). Before PSM, univariate analysis indicated that the 5-year OS rate was inferior in the ALND group compared to the SLNBx group (86.6% vs. 93.3%, respectively; P = 0.002); multivariate analysis did not show a difference between groups (P = 0.325). After PSM, 258 and 136 patients were included in the ALND and SLNBx groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the ALND and SLNBx groups in DFS (5-year rate, 75.8% vs. 76.9%, respectively; P = 0.406) or OS (5-year rate, 88.7% vs. 93.1%, respectively; P = 0.083). Conclusions: SLNBx alone did not compromise oncological outcomes in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC. The omission of ALND might be a possible option for axillary management in patients treated with NAC and postoperative radiotherapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-596
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023.03

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Axillary lymph node dissection
  • Breast cancer
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Residual nodal disease
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Omission of axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ypN+ breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective multicenter study (KROG 21-06)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this