Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pentoxifylline vs. corticosteroid to treat severe alcoholic hepatitis: A randomised, non-inferiority, open trial

  • Seung Ha Park
  • , Dong Joon Kim*
  • , Young Seok Kim
  • , Hyung Joon Yim
  • , Won Young Tak
  • , Heon Ju Lee
  • , Joo Hyun Sohn
  • , Ki Tae Yoon
  • , In Hee Kim
  • , Hyoung Su Kim
  • , Soon Ho Um
  • , Soon Koo Baik
  • , June Sung Lee
  • , Ki Tae Suk
  • , Sang Gyune Kim
  • , Sang Jun Suh
  • , Soo Young Park
  • , Tae Yeob Kim
  • , Jae Young Jang
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Inje University
  • Hallym University
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Korea University
  • Kyungpook National University
  • Yeungnam University
  • Hanyang University
  • Pusan National University
  • Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Background & Aims: Both corticosteroid and pentoxifylline reduce short-term mortality in severe alcoholic hepatitis. However, few studies have directly compared the efficacy of pentoxifylline and corticosteroid in patients with this condition. Methods: In this multicentre, open-labelled, randomised noninferiority trial, we assigned 121 patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (Maddrey's discriminant functionP32) to receive either pentoxifylline (400 mg, 3 times daily, in 62 subjects) or prednisolone (40 mg daily, in 59 subjects). The primary end point was non-inferiority in survival at the 1 month time point for the pentoxifylline treatment compared with prednisolone. Results: The 1-month survival rate of patients receiving pentoxifylline was 75.8% (15 deaths) compared with 88.1% (7 deaths) in those, taking prednisolone, for a treatment difference of 12.3% (95% confidence interval,-4.2% to 28.7%; p = 0.08). The 95% confidence interval for the observed difference exceeded the predefined margin of non-inferiority (D15%) and included zero. The 6-month survival rate was not significantly different between the pentoxifylline and prednisolone groups (64.5% vs. 72.9%; p = 0.23). At 7 days, the response to therapy assessed by the Lille model was significantly lower in the prednisolone group (n = 58) than in the pentoxifylline group (n = 59): 0.35 vs. 0.50 (p = 0.012). Hepatitis complications, including hepatorenal syndrome and side effects, such as infection and gastrointestinal bleeding, were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that the efficacy of the pentoxifylline is not statistically equivalent to the efficacy of prednisolone, supporting the use of prednisolone as a preferred treatment option in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)792-798
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hepatology
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Alcoholic hepatitis
  • Corticosteroid
  • Non-inferiority trial
  • Pentoxifylline

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pentoxifylline vs. corticosteroid to treat severe alcoholic hepatitis: A randomised, non-inferiority, open trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this