Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study comparing a candesartan cilexetil/rosuvastatin calcium fixed-dose combination with the concomitant administration of candesartan cilexetil and rosuvastatin calcium in healthy Korean subjects

  • Dan Bee Park
  • , Kyungho Jang
  • , Jae Won Lee
  • , Cheol Won Park
  • , Back Hwan Lee
  • , Min Gul Kim
  • , Ji Young Jeon*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Jeonbuk National University
  • Seoul National University
  • Alvogen Korea CO., Ltd.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Context: A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of candesartan and rosuvastatin was recently developed for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and expected to enhance patient compliance. Objective: This study was performed to compare the single-dose pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of DP-R208 (candesartan and rosuvastatin FDC) to those of each component administered alone in healthy Korean male volunteers. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 healthy Korean volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-treatment, two-way crossover study. During each treatment period, subjects received the test formulation (FDC tablet containing candesartan and rosuvastatin) or reference formulation (co-administration of candesartan and rosuvastatin). Plasma samples were collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours post-dose. Safety and tolerability were assessed by the evaluation of adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, laboratory assessments, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and vital sign measurements. Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric leastsquare mean ratios of Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were 0.86 - 1.00, 0.92 - 1.04, and 0.92 - 1.03 for candesartan, and 0.88 - 1.06, 0.91 - 1.08, and 0.91 - 1.03 for rosuvastatin, respectively. All of the AEs were mild, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the formulations. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic properties of the test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence. Discussion and conclusion: Both formulations were safe and well tolerated, and no significant difference was observed in the safety assessments of the treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-294
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Angiotensin receptor blocker
  • Bioequivalence study
  • Candesartan cilexetil
  • Fixed-dose combination
  • HMG-CoA reductase
  • Rosuvastatin calcium

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study comparing a candesartan cilexetil/rosuvastatin calcium fixed-dose combination with the concomitant administration of candesartan cilexetil and rosuvastatin calcium in healthy Korean subjects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this