Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phase III clinical trial (RERISE study) results of efficacy and safety of radotinib compared with imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia

  • Jae Yong Kwak
  • , Sung Hyun Kim
  • , Suk Joong Oh
  • , Dae Young Zang
  • , Hawk Kim
  • , Jeong A. Kim
  • , Young Rok Do
  • , Hyeoung Joon Kim
  • , Joon Seong Park
  • , Chul Won Choi
  • , Won Sik Lee
  • , Yeung Chul Mun
  • , Jee Hyun Kong
  • , Joo Seop Chung
  • , Ho Jin Shin
  • , Dae Young Kim
  • , Jinny Park
  • , Chul Won Jung
  • , Udomsak Bunworasate
  • , Narcisa Sonia Comia
  • Saengsuree Jootar, Arry Harryanto Reksodiputro, Priscilla B. Caguioa, Sung Eun Lee, Dong Wook Kim*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Dong-A University
  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
  • Hallym University
  • University of Ulsan
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Keimyung University
  • Chonnam National University
  • Ajou University
  • Korea University
  • Inje University
  • Ewha Womans University
  • Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
  • Pusan National University
  • Gachon University
  • Sungkyunkwan University
  • Chulalongkorn University
  • Mary Mediatrix Medical Center
  • Mahidol University
  • University of Indonesia
  • St. Luke's Medical Center Quezon City

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Radotinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in Korea for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in patients newly diagnosed or with insufficient response to other TKIs. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radotinib as first-line therapy for CML-CP. Experimental Design: This multinational, open-label study assigned patients (1:1:1) to one of two twice-daily radotinib doses, or imatinib daily. The primary endpoint was major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. Results: Two hundred forty-one patients were randomized to receive radotinib 300 mg (n ¼ 79) or 400 mg twice-daily (n ¼ 81), or imatinib 400 mg daily (n ¼ 81). MMR rates by 12 months were higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg (52%) or radotinib 400 mg twice-daily (46%) versus imatinib (30%; P ¼ 0.0044 and P ¼ 0.0342, respectively). Complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 12 months were higher for radotinib 300 mg (91%) versus imatinib (77%; P ¼ 0.0120). Early molecular response at 3 months occurred in 86% and 87% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg and radotinib 400 mg, respectively, and 71% of those receiving imatinib. By 12 months, no patients had progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis. Most adverse events were manageable with dose reduction. Conclusions: Radotinib demonstrated superiority over imatinib in CCyR and MMR in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01511289.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7180-7188
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume23
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017.12.1

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III clinical trial (RERISE study) results of efficacy and safety of radotinib compared with imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this