Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prescription of antibiotics for adults with acute infectious diarrhea in Korea: A population-based study

  • Hyo Jin Lee
  • , Ki Ho Park
  • , Dong Ah Park
  • , Joonhong Park
  • , Byoung Wook Bang
  • , Seung Soon Lee
  • , Eun Jung Lee
  • , Youn Jeong Kim
  • , Sung Kwan Hong
  • , Yang Ree Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Kyung Hee University
  • National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency
  • Inha University
  • Hallym University
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • CHA University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Acute infectious diarrhea (AID) is a commonly observed condition globally. Several studies recommend against the use of empiric antibiotic therapy for AID, except in some cases of travelers' diarrhea. However, many physicians prescribe antimicrobial agents for AID. We aimed to determine the rate of antibiotic use and the associated prescription patterns among adults with AID. Materials and Methods: This population-based, retrospective epidemiological study was performed using Korean National Health Insurance claims data from 2016 to 2017. The study population comprised adults (age ≥18 years) who had visited clinics with AID-related complaints. Exclusion criteria were the presence of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, and other non-infectious forms of colitis. Patients who underwent surgery during admission were also excluded. Results: The study population comprised 1,613,057 adult patients with AID (767,606 [47.6%] men). Young patients (age 18 - 39 years) accounted for 870,239 (54.0%) of the study population. Overall, 752,536 (46.7%) cases received antibiotic prescriptions. The rate of antibiotic administration tended to be higher among elderly patients (age ≥65 years) than among younger patients (49.5% vs. 46.4%, P <0.001). The antibiotics most frequently prescribed in both monotherapy and combination regimens were fluoroquinolones (29.8%), rifaximin (26.8%), second-generation cephalosporins (9.2%), third-generation cephalosporins (7.3%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (5.5%), and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (5.3%). Patients who visited tertiary care hospitals had lower rates of antibiotic therapy (n = 14,131, 41.8%) than did those visiting private clinics (n = 532,951, 47.1%). In total, 56,275 (62.3%) admitted patients received antibiotic therapy, whereas outpatients had lower rates of antibiotic prescription (n = 694,204, 46.0%). Conclusion: This study revealed differences between the antibiotics used to treat AID in Korea and those recommended by the guidelines for AID treatment. Multifaceted efforts are necessary to strengthen physicians' adherence to published guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-304
Number of pages210
JournalInfection and Chemotherapy
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Anti-bacterial agents
  • Diarrhea
  • Dysentery
  • Epidemiology
  • Gastroenteritis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prescription of antibiotics for adults with acute infectious diarrhea in Korea: A population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this