Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Projectile points and their implications

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper considers interpersonal human violence during the Upper Paleolithic and the subsequent transitional period between the Paleolithic and Neolithic by examining lithic variation against the related theoretical background. The human mind's evolutionary capacity for violence was well in place during this period, so changes in violence at the time were not influenced by cognitive evolution. However, the cultural learning process related to increased social complexity directly affected human behavior during this short-term transition. Increased interpersonal contact translated not only into positive effects such as sharing food and strategic resources procurement, but also into negative effects such as intensified conflicts and greater violence. The pattern of violence during the transition period is reflected in evidence from projectile points.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-49
Number of pages9
JournalArchaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010.09

Keywords

  • Neolithic
  • Projectile points
  • Transitional period
  • Upper Paleolithic
  • Violence

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Communication & Media Studies
  • Archaeology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Projectile points and their implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this