Abstract
High school science and math courses play a vital role in STEM opportunities and long-term labor market outcomes. Research on STEM inequality often focuses on gender and racial disparities, with less attention paid to socioeconomic inequalities in course-taking. Analyzing nationally representative data from 1992, 2004, and 2013 graduates, we find similar patterns of socioeconomic inequality in both science and mathematics subjects. Disparities persist in high-level courses, such as calculus, physics 2, chemistry 2, or biology 2, while gaps in mid-level courses, such as chemistry 1 and algebra 2, have lessened over time. Although both low- and high-SES students in the early 2010s take more advanced courses compared to their counterparts in the 1990s and early 2000s, high-SES students are more likely to do so. Moreover, even with efforts to increase and broaden access, disparities between socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged schools in advanced STEM course-taking have grown. Socioeconomic disparities in high school STEM courses continue to impact STEM opportunities for U.S. students.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 273-310 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Course-taking
- educational inequality
- high schools
- math
- science
- SES
- STEM
Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics
- Education & Training
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in STEM Opportunities? Trends in Access to Advanced Science and Math Courses in American High Schools, 1992–2013'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver