Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reply to “Comment on ‘Magnetoresistance and differential conductance in multiwalled carbon nanotubes’ ”

  • Jinhee Kim
  • , Kicheon Kang
  • , Jeong O. Lee
  • , Ju Jin Kim
  • Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science
  • Jeonbuk National University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Our interpretation of the magnetoresistance and the differential conductance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes, based on the depleted density of states, was questioned by Schönenberger and Bachtold in their Comment. They have concluded that our data were rather in support of the diffusive motion of electrons, contradictory to our interpretation. In this Reply we argue against this conclusion and discuss in detail why the weak localization scheme is not likely to explain the magnetoresistance of multiwalled carbon nanotubes observed in our experiments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPhysical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics
Volume64
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Materials Science
  • Physics & Astronomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to “Comment on ‘Magnetoresistance and differential conductance in multiwalled carbon nanotubes’ ”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this