Abstract
Five aspatial and spatial classification methods were compared in this study: Standard per-pixel maximum likelihood classification; Kettig and Landgrebe's ECHO classification; maximum likelihood classification using the segment mean; classification using the segment divergence index; and maximum likelihood classification using the segment probability density function (PDF). The five classification methods were compared using test data from digital aerial imagery with a nominal 1-m pixel size, and four multispectral bands, acquired over Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. Classification using the segment divergence index produced the lowest accuracy, followed by ECHO, standard maximum likelihood classification and classification with segment mean. The highest accuracy was obtained from classification using the segment PDF.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 3403-3412 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | International Journal of Remote Sensing |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 16 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2006.08.20 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Segment based image classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver