Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Switching to besifovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: A randomized trial

  • Hyung Joon Yim*
  • , Yeon Seok Seo
  • , Ji Hoon Kim
  • , Won Kim
  • , Young Kul Jung
  • , Jae Young Jang
  • , Sae Hwan Lee
  • , Yun Soo Kim
  • , Chang Wook Kim
  • , Hyoung Su Kim
  • , Jae Jun Shim
  • , Eun Young Cho
  • , In Hee Kim
  • , Byung Seok Lee
  • , Jeong Hoon Lee
  • , Byung Seok Kim
  • , Jeong Won Jang
  • , Hyun Woong Lee
  • , Jung Hyun Kwon
  • , Moon Young Kim
  • Do Seon Song, Jung Gil Park, Yoon Seok Lee, Eileen L. Yoon, Han Ah Lee, Seong Hee Kang, Jin Mo Yang*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Korea University
  • SMG-SNU Seoul Boramae Medical Center
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Gachon University
  • The Catholic University of Korea
  • Hallym University
  • Kyung Hee University
  • Wonkwang University
  • Chungnam National University
  • Seoul National University
  • Catholic University of Daegu
  • Yonsei University
  • Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
  • Yeungnam University
  • Inje University
  • Hanyang University
  • Chung-Ang University

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Aims: Besifovir (BSV) showed comparable antiviral activity and superior safety profiles to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, no data are available regarding the antiviral efficacy and safety of BSV in patients with CHB who switched from long-term TDF to BSV. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of a 48-week BSV therapy in patients with CHB who switched from long-term TDF treatment. Methods: In this non-inferiority trial, 153 CHB patients treated with TDF for ≥48 weeks who had hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <20 IU/mL were randomized to receive either BSV 150 mg or TDF 300 mg for 48 weeks. Results: The per-protocol analysis included 130 patients (BSV group, 64; TDF group, 66). The median duration of TDF use before enrollment was 4.14 years. After 48 weeks, 100.0% and 98.5% patients in the BSV and TDF groups, respectively, met the primary endpoint (HBV DNA <20 IU/mL), demonstrating the non-inferior antiviral efficacy of BSV to TDF (95% confidence interval –0.01 to 0.04; P>0.999), with a predefined margin of –0.18. The mean percentage changes in estimated glomerular filtration rates were slightly better in the BSV group (1.67±11.73%) than in the TDF group (–1.24±11.02%). The BSV group showed a significant improvement in bone turnover biomarkers compared to the TDF group; accordingly, hip and spine bone mineral density increased in the BSV group. Conclusions: In patients with CHB receiving long-term TDF, switching to BSV may improve renal and bone safety with non-inferior antiviral efficacy compared to that of maintaining TDF. (Clin Mol Hepatol 2025;31:810-822).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)810-822
Number of pages13
JournalClinical and Molecular Hepatology
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025.07

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Antiviral therapy
  • Bone mineral density
  • Hepatitis B
  • Nephrotoxicity
  • Sustained virologic response

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Medicine
  • Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Switching to besifovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: A randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this