Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic evaluation of SAM prompting strategies for agricultural land extraction with GeoSAM

  • Jeongbae Jeon
  • , Sangwan Lee
  • , Solhee Kim*
  • , Taegon Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Wonkwang University
  • Jeonbuk National University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › peer-review

Abstract

This study presents GeoSAM, a QGIS plugin that integrates five SAM prompting strategies (Text, Box, Point, Detection-guided Box and Detection-guided Point) for agricultural land extraction. Using 25 cm-resolution aerial imagery, Point Prompt achieved the highest F1-Score (0.9785) but is limited for large-scale use. Text Prompt scored 0.9406, with generic terms (e.g. ‘farm plot’) outperforming crop-specific terms. Adding text to Box Prompt improved its F1-Score from 0.5417 to 0.9220 (~70% gain), highlighting the value of semantic information. Detection-guided Point (0.8861) slightly outperformed Detection-guided Box+Text (0.8785). Compared to 97.05% F1 with 8 cm drone imagery, the performance dropped to 88.62% at 25 cm resolution, underscoring resolution's critical impact. GeoSAM helps practitioners navigate the accuracy–automation trade-off by offering context-appropriate segmentation strategies within a unified tool.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2717446
JournalGeocarto International
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2026

Keywords

  • QGIS plugin
  • Segment anything model
  • agricultural land extraction
  • prompting strategy
  • remote sensing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic evaluation of SAM prompting strategies for agricultural land extraction with GeoSAM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this