Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Technocratic beliefs and delegative democratic attitudes in states of emergency: evidence from a cross-national analysis

  • Hanna Kim*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Pittsburgh

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous research on delegative democracy has predominantly emphasized its structural aspects, leaving the individual-level determinants of support for this governance relatively unexplored. While some studies have investigated the association between trust in the president and delegative democratic attitudes (DDA), the connection between technocratic beliefs, DDA, and the context of national emergencies has been minimally addressed. This study aims to fill this research gap by examining the correlation between technocratic beliefs and DDA, specifically focusing on how emergencies influence this relationship. Analysing data from the Asian Barometer Survey and the World Values Survey, the results indicate a robust connection between individuals’ technocratic beliefs and DDA. Moreover, this correlation exhibits greater strength as a country’s level of emergency escalates. These results may provide valuable insights into our understanding of both individual and structural factors associated with public support for delegative democracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1397-1422
Number of pages26
JournalDemocratization
Volume31
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Asian barometer survey
  • Delegative democracy
  • public opinion
  • states of emergency
  • technocracy
  • world values survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technocratic beliefs and delegative democratic attitudes in states of emergency: evidence from a cross-national analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this