Abstract
The present study analyzes the economic effects concerning deferred disposal of spent fuel through long-term storage. According to the cost analysis, a scenario that a 90-year deferral of an HLW (High-Level Waste) repository construction in favor of a long-term storage of spent fuel would be economically preferable to another scenario based on the year 2040 chosen as the starting point for construction on a repository. That is, the former scenario would cost about 1/2 of the latter. This finding is an estimated result from an economic perspective only, assuming the disposal of 20,000-ton PWR spent fuel and 16,000-ton CANDU spent fuel. Still, it seems necessary to elicit proper term of storage for radioactive waste in order to comply with the so-called Polluter-Pays principle that the current generation cannot pass on its radioactive waste to the next generation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 12-18 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Progress in Nuclear Energy |
| Volume | 59 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2012.08 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Construction
- Cost estimation
- Deferral
- Economic effects
- HLW repository
- Long-term storage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The economic effects of the deferred disposal of spent fuel in Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver