Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Revival of ‘Big Government’ Discourse in South Korea, 2017

  • Inhye Heo*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

After the democratisation of South Korea in 1987, political discourse on ‘big government’ nearly disappeared, largely because it recalled past authoritarianism. Authoritarian states are highly likely to employ ‘big government’ – exerting policy influence over the distribution of private resources – to sustain their political power, and Korea’s authoritarian state was no exception. Thus, newly inaugurated President Moon Jae-in’s official implication that he would pursue big government is notable, because he claimed to represent pro-democracy groups that opposed both historical authoritarianism and the former president’s undemocratic governance. In this context, this study examines external and internal political-economic factors behind the revival of big government discourse in Korea. Results show that critical factors included the lack of pressure in the global capitalist market and the dominance of governmentalists over marketists in the political-economic discourse influencing the administration’s maintenance and expansion of its political foundation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)913-929
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Asian and African Studies
Volume54
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019.09.1

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Big government
  • governmentalists
  • income inequality
  • marketists
  • Moon Jae-in administration
  • South Korea

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

  • Geography
  • Development Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Revival of ‘Big Government’ Discourse in South Korea, 2017'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this