Validation of the korean version of the 16-item prodromal questionnaire in a non-help-seeking college population

  • Sung Wan Kim
  • , Young Chul Chung
  • , Young Shin Kang
  • , Jae Kyeong Kim
  • , Ji Eun Jang
  • , Min Jhon
  • , Ju Yeon Lee
  • , Jae Min Kim
  • , Il Seon Shin
  • , Jin Sang Yoon*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 16-item Prodromal Questionnaire (KPQ-16) in non-help-seeking university students. Methods Among 2,246 university students participated in the initial screening, 257 subjects with KPQ-16 scores ≥4 were interviewed. The criteria for ultra-high risk (UHR) of psychosis of the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) were the gold standard for diagnosis. An exploratory modified version of the questionnaire (mKPQ-16), to which three items from the Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory were added, was also used to compensate for items on thought and cognitive problems. Results Seventeen subjects met the CAARMS criteria for UHR of psychosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was highest for the mKPQ-16 total score (AUROC=0.831, p<0.001). The use of cutoff total scores of 7 for the mKPQ-16 and 6 for the KPQ-16 resulted in the best balance of sensitivity (76.5% and 64.7%, respectively) and specificity (75.4% and 71.2%, re-spectively). Conclusion The Korean versions of the PQ-16 are good instruments for screening for psychosis risk in university students. This validation of a questionnaire version with a small number of items may make it feasible to screen large numbers of young adults in the community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-117
Number of pages7
JournalPsychiatry Investigation
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018.02

Keywords

  • Attenuated psychosis syndrome
  • PQ-16
  • Schizophrenia
  • Screening
  • Ultra-high risk

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the korean version of the 16-item prodromal questionnaire in a non-help-seeking college population'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this