Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

Sooyeon Song; Thomas K. Wood

doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12951

Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

Sooyeon Song
, Thomas K. Wood^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Animal Science

Pennsylvania State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	246-247
Number of pages	2
Journal	Environmental Microbiology Reports
Volume	13
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12951
State	Published - 2021.06

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

Agriculture & Forestry

Access to Document

10.1111/1758-2229.12951

Cite this

@article{52538f247f464d178faf84b5133f5b8e,

title = "Waiting for Godot: response to {\textquoteleft}How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells{\textquoteright}",

author = "Sooyeon Song and Wood, \{Thomas K.\}",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1111/1758-2229.12951",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "246--247",

journal = "Environmental Microbiology Reports",

issn = "1758-2229",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waiting for Godot

T2 - response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

AU - Song, Sooyeon

AU - Wood, Thomas K.

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85104685407

U2 - 10.1111/1758-2229.12951

DO - 10.1111/1758-2229.12951

M3 - Letter

C2 - 33884772

AN - SCOPUS:85104685407

SN - 1758-2229

VL - 13

SP - 246

EP - 247

JO - Environmental Microbiology Reports

JF - Environmental Microbiology Reports

IS - 3

ER -

Waiting for Godot: response to ‘How dead is dead? Viable but non-culturable versus persister cells’

Quacquarelli Symonds(QS) Subject Topics

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this